Alpine Saxon Woods Dividend Strategy

Overview

The Dividend strategy invests in companies that have maintained or increased dividends for at least the past 5 years. Fundamental research is performed on each company’s ability to sustain its dividend and potentially increase those payments in the future, incorporating analysis on free cash flow and numerous balance sheet metrics. The strategy is market capitalization and sector agnostic, but the nature of dividend paying companies tends to tilt towards a mid-to-large capitalization profile.  

‍

Investment Objectives

The objective of the Strategy is to generate high current income, growth of income, and capital preservation by investing in high-quality companies that pay attractive dividends and have the potential to increase those dividends over time. This approach aims to provide consistent returns, especially during market volatility.

‍

Portfolio Construction

The portfolio is constructed using liquid, publicly traded stocks and is typically fully invested. Positions are generally initiated at weights of 3% to 5%, with the portfolio normally holding between 35 and 45 securities. To maintain diversification and manage risk, individual security positions are generally limited to no more than 10% of portfolio assets, while sector exposure is limited to 25% of the portfolio or 1.5 times the benchmark weighting, whichever is greater. Quantitative risk management statistics are regularly reviewed to identify where portfolio risks exist and to evaluate the sources and magnitude of those risks.

‍

Risk management is an ongoing component of the investment process. Portfolio holdings are continuously monitored, and investment theses are formally reviewed when a stock declines 15% from its initial purchase price. This review is intended to determine whether the original investment rationale remains intact and whether the risk-reward profile continues to be attractive.

‍

Securities may be sold for several reasons, including changes in company fundamentals, deterioration in operating or financial health, or when the original investment thesis is no longer valid. Positions may also be exited when anticipated catalysts fail to materialize or are no longer expected to drive future value creation. In addition, holdings may be reduced or eliminated when they reach the team's valuation target. Portfolio diversification guidelines, including individual security and sector exposure limits, are also considered as part of the sell discipline and ongoing portfolio management process.

Documents

As of

June 30, 2026

Dividend Strategy Commentary
Dividend Strategy Factsheet
Dividend Strategy GIPS Composite Report
No items found.

Quick Facts

As of

June 30, 2026

Fund
SMA Inception Date
1/1/2019
Benchmark 1
S&P Dividend ETF (SDY)
Benchmark 2
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD)
Strategy AUM
$89.42M
Investment Minimum
Negotiable
Fees
Negotiable

Meet the Team

Mark T. Spellman
  • 32 years industry experience
  • BS: Boston College
  • MBA: UMass Amherst
View More
Brian Hennessey, CFA
  • 27 years industry experience
  • BA: Williams College
  • MBA: M.I.T.
View More
Sarah Hunt, CFA, CFP®
  • 26 years industry experience
  • BA: Wesleyan University
  • MBA: Fordham University
View More
Ronak Jain, CFA
  • 17 years industry experience
  • BBA: Macaulay Honor College at Baruch College

‍

View More

Characteristics

As of

June 30, 2026

Strategy
Benchmark 1
Number of Holdings
37
155
Median Market Cap ($B)
90.91
21.74
TTM Dividend Yield
2.57
2.79
1-Year Dividend Growth
6.21
5.19
5-Year Dividend Growth
6.89
6.39
P/E 1-Year Forward
20.07
19.21
Free Cash Flow Yield
3.94
3.89
Total Debt/EBITDA
3.04
3.01
Active Share
84.60
–
Annual Turnover
60.7
–

Sector Analysis

As of

June 30, 2026

Strategy
Benchmark 1
Financials
15.4
%
13.1
%
Technology
12.9
%
8.2
%
Healthcare
12.8
%
7.5
%
Industrials
12.6
%
19.1
%
Materials
11.8
%
7.6
%
Consumer Staples
9.7
%
16.5
%
Real Estate
7.7
%
4.4
%
Utilities
7.7
%
14.6
%
Consumer Discretionary
6.2
%
4.4
%
Energy
3.2
%
2.4
%
Communications
0.0
%
2.2
%

Top 10 Holdings

As of

June 30, 2026

Fund
JPMORGAN CHASE
4.0
%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS
3.6
%
ABBVIE INC
3.6
%
EQUINIX INC
3.4
%
CISCO SYSTEMS
3.4
%
BROADCOM INC
3.3
%
L3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES
3.3
%
AMGEN INC
3.3
%
MEDTRONIC PLC
3.3
%
EMERSON ELECTRIC CO
3.2
%
TOTAL
34.4
%

Risk/Returns Metrics

As of

June 30, 2026

Strategy
Benchmark 1
Alpha
3.75
–
Beta
0.91
1.00
Sharpe Ratio
0.55
0.32
Standard Deviation
14.16
14.55
Up/Down Capture
100/84
–

Average Annual Total Return

As of

June 30, 2026

As of

August 31, 2026

YTD
1 Year
3 Year
5 Year
Since Inception
Gross
12.69
%
21.97
%
17.99
%
11.58
%
11.81
%
Net (Composite)
12.27
%
20.96
%
16.92
%
10.56
%
10.79
%
Benchmark 1
10.73
%
15.08
%
10.33
%
7.28
%
10.30
%
YTD
1 Year
3 Year
5 Year
Since Inception
Gross
14.74
%
19.06
%
18.61
%
11.40
%
11.80
%
Net (Composite)
14.05
%
18.05
%
17.50
%
10.36
%
10.76
%
Benchmark 1
13.69
%
13.46
%
11.41
%
7.42
%
10.44
%

The Quarter's Top Contributors

As of

June 30, 2026

Flow control equipment manufacturer Flowserve (FLS) was a top contributor for the quarter, benefiting from record-breaking demand in the nuclear and data center sectors, as well as a significant deal to transfer all remaining asbestos-related liabilities and insurance assets to an affiliate of Oaktree Capital Management. Power solutions company Cummins Inc (CMI) was also a positive contributor, benefiting from record demand for backup power generators required for massive AI-driven data center expansions. We view CMI as one of the more un-derappreciated AI infrastructure plays. Finally, Steel Dynamics (STLD) benefited from foreign steel tariffs, with both demand and pricing on US-produced steel products providing signifi-cant tailwinds. STLD is one of the primary beneficiaries of "Buy American" initiatives that are fueling a trend towards onshoring of US manufacturing.

The Quarter's Top Detractors

As of

June 30, 2026

Home Depot (HD) was one of the major detractors of performance in 4Q25, as stubbornly high mortgage rates and home price uncertainty caused homeowners to postpone large-scale "big-ticket" projects like kitchens and bathrooms. We continue to like HD as a best-in-class retailer that could benefit from declining interest rates and pent-up demand for remodeling activity. HP Inc (HPQ) also faced a challenging quarter as investors were spooked by a com-bination of subdued demand and pricing and rising component costs (particularly memory costs), resulting in margin compression. While this position has not performed as we had hoped, we think its 14% free cash flow yield, 5.4% current yield and its massive buyback pro-gram make the shares attractive. Finally, Garmin Ltd (GRMN) struggled due to a combination of slowing topline growth and margin compression as the company ramped its R&D spend. We are hopeful that the launch of the Fenix 8 Pro and new AI-driven health features announced at the CES in January will reignite growth.